|
Beginning
1
|
Developing
2
|
Accomplished
3
|
Exemplary
4
|
Score
|
|
Lab report introduction
|
Has little background information. Lacks a purpose statement and/or a value statement.
|
Contains some background information, a purpose statement and a value statement.
|
Has good background information a clear purpose and value statement.
|
Written so that the background information, the purpose statement and the value statement are clearly connected.
|
|
|
Lab report procedure
|
Some attempt to describe the materials and procedure but crucial information is missing.
|
Most of the procedural steps are included,but uses an incorrect format or lacks pictures or diagrams.
|
Includes all the procedural steps. Has relevant pictures and the correct format.
|
Includes all the procedural steps. Has relevant pictures and the correct format. Identifies and justifies any assumptions.
|
|
|
Lab report results
|
Some data recorded
|
All the trial data is neatly organized in a spreadsheet and includes the final calculation, but important information may be missing or there may be a math error.
|
Data is neatly organized in a spread sheet. Units are clearly labeled and a sample calculation has been included if needed.
|
Meets the previous criteria and uses the operation rules for significant figures. Includes relevant statistical evaluation and data charts.
|
|
|
Lab report discussion / conclusion
|
Some attempt to discuss the findings
|
Describes the findings but little or no analysis,
|
Discussion includes good analysis Describes the value of the knowledge gained. Findings are compared to other lab groups and/or includes references to statistical analysis if appropriate.
|
In addition to the previous criteria the discussion includes deductive and/or inductive analysis Analysis is very original and creative and presents a unique perspective.
|
|
|
Lab report general paper
|
Paper is passed in late.
OR
Originality is questionable.
OR
Report has significant format, grammatical, content or procedural errors.
|
Original paper is passed in on time but may have some format, grammatical, content or procedural errors.
|
Very few grammatical errors. Format ,content and procedure are correct. The writing style is appropriate for technical lab reports.
|
Has no written mechanical errors and demonstrates a high level of writing skill by weaving purpose, observation and analysis into a cohesive body of written communication.
|
|