
Portland Public
Schools
To:
From: Kate Snyder, Chair, Finance
Committee
Date: March 23, 2010
Subject: Finance Committee’s Proposed Fiscal Year
2011 Budget
Last Thursday, March
19, 2010, the Finance Committee voted our proposed FY11 budget out of
subcommittee for your consideration.
In the days leading
up to the culmination of our subcommittee process, there was some confusion
about what was “in” and what was “not in” the Superintendent’s proposed budget. I hope that after reading this letter you
will have a better understanding of how the Superintendent’s budget responded
to the known fiscal constraints in FY11 and FY12 while advocating for district
wide equity, responding to enrollment trends and laying the foundation for
multi year planning and investments which seek to strengthen Portland Public
Schools. I hope, too, that you will
fully understand the actions taken by the Finance Committee in reaction to the
Superintendent’s budget and in response to unanticipated state subsidy.
When I asked the
Superintendent to provide his guidance to the unanticipated increase in state
funding (in the amount of $1,473,151), his response dated March 12th
included many of the elements that I, and members of the Finance Committee,
believed were already included in his proposed budget presented on March 3rd. It wasn’t until the evening of March 15th
that we fully understood what was “in” and what was “out”. Therefore, our subsequent subcommittee deliberations
focused on understanding the impact of Dr. Morse’s inclusions and exclusions;
and weighing our options. Where we
thought we had $1,473,151 in unanticipated funds to “work with” at the
subcommittee level, we found ourselves with $1,165,000 of unmet needs; which
the Superintendent characterized as “more important than the cuts (he) made (in
his proposed budget)”.
As you consider the
Finance Committee’s proposed budget, please take the following information into
consideration.
Unmet needs not included in the Superintendent’s budget:
($200K – Federally Funded, not included in
sum)
(Accidentally removed from the Superintendent’s
budget) $75K
Amount
not in the Superintendent’s Budget: $1,165,000
Conversely, there
were elements of the Superintendent’s budget that were communicated as “cuts”
that were accidentally left in the budget.
Elements identified as “cuts” remaining in the
Superintendent’s budget:
We also learned that
there were unallocated funds in the Superintendent’s budget in the amount of: $224K
Unexpected
funds in the Superintendent’s Budget: $642,000
The Finance
Committee’s proposed budget does several things.
First, we voted
unanimously to include the following unmet needs:
▪ 4 Elementary Classroom Teachers:
(Presumpscot Grade 1, Riverton
Grade 3, Lyseth Grade 5 and Longfellow Grade 1/2)
▪ 8.4 ELL Teachers
▪ 3 Social Studies Teachers at
▪ 1 Literacy Instructor at
▪ 1 Instructional Technology Aid at
▪ 2 Elementary World Language Teachers
▪ Wireless at Lyseth, Hall and Longfellow
▪ 1 Family Living Teacher
▪ 1 Coop position at
Second, we voted
unanimously to remove $600,000 from line 9100 “Fund Transfers Out” of the
Finance & Operations cost center and we put $300,000 in line 9000
“Contingency” of the School Committee cost center. (Net decrease from
Superintendent’s proposed budget:
$300,000.)
Funds remain in the
Finance Committee’s proposed FY11 budget in the amount of $388,000 for middle
school sports, high school freshman sports, other high school athletic programs
and high school co-curricular.
Our proposed budget’s
final tally recognizes and uses the unallocated $224,000 from the
Superintendent’s proposed budget, as well as the additional, unanticipated
state subsidy in the amount of $1,473,151.
In the March 12th
memo, there were additional unmet needs identified by the Superintendent for
consideration where the Finance Committee did not act.
In his first “tier”
of unmet needs the Superintendent advocates for 6.5 kindergarten teachers
($325,000) and any possible funding for capital improvements for
facilities. In his second “tier” of
unmet needs, Dr. Morse identifies a loss of 18 locally funded Ed Techs which
reduces the district from 153.06 locally funded Ed Tech FTE’s to 135.06. He advocates that “even a partial
restoration” would greatly benefit students.
Lastly, Dr. Morse recognizes the decrease from 16.5 to 14.5 music
teachers and calls for a plan to address the fact there are music teachers who
are “dramatically underutilized due to low enrollment”.
The Finance
Committee’s proposed budget represents an overall increase in expenditures, beyond
the Superintendent’s proposed budget, of $1,005,000.
We unanimously present
a FY2011 Portland Public Schools budget in the amount of $89,800,834. This budget represents a $1,536,209 or 1.68% decrease
from FY10. Our proposed budget will
require $67,471,128 to be raised by local taxes, an increase of 1.2% or
$798,905 over FY10.